Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:19:52 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001205221719.29725A@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001205220943.95872B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Robert Watson wrote: > Recently, pppctl was made thread-enabled, meaning that it relies on > libc_r. This makes the NOLIBC_R cannot be used with buildworld anymore. > Given that making pppctl depend on !NOLIBC_R may not be all that helpful, > it looks like we may need to lose NOLIBC_R. Presumably over time, threads > in default system applications will only become more popular. Any > thoughts (especially in light of upcoming KSE changes, which will make > threading integral to the system architecture)? OK, lose NOLIBC_R -- not that I'm biased or anything ;-) -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1001205221719.29725A>