Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:13:29 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: mjacob@feral.com, gallatin@cs.duke.edu, ken@kdm.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCIOCGETCONF/PCIOCREAD requires write permission? Message-ID: <200012080713.AAA10039@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:07:49 MST." <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com> "Chad R. Larson" writes: : Has the core group ever weighed in on this? Does the BSDi merger : change any of the FreeBSD focus with regard to other hardware : architectures? Core, per se, hasn't. There's a very strong history in this project that if a port is supported, breaking it is unacceptible. FreeBSD has moved beyond intel only, and we need to deal with that, even if there are things we can get away with on i386 and can't on other platforms. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012080713.AAA10039>