Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:09:50 -0700 (MST) From: Barkley Vowk <bvowk@math.ualberta.ca> To: David Kirchner <dpk@dpk.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?). Message-ID: <20051109130654.R3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca> In-Reply-To: <35c231bf0511091204t60817b15v6934e41323f4060a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20051109113648.D3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca> <35c231bf0511091204t60817b15v6934e41323f4060a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was assigned to it. I'd check on the running box but: koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0 disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported /dev only shows: koth# ls /dev/da0* /dev/da0 /dev/da0s1 /dev/da0s1c /dev/da0s1d So I expect it is all assigned to the one slice. On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, David Kirchner wrote: > On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <bvowk@math.ualberta.ca> wrote: >> I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. >> >> Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not >> having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. >> >> However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic: >> >> /dev/da0s1d 723G 54G 611G 8% /home >> >> Certainly not what I was hoping for. >> >> I've tried both i386 and amd64 releases. >> >> Especially since that apparent limit is much smaller than 1TB. > > Curious. Is there any remaining space for a second slice, as in da0s2? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051109130654.R3622>