Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:45:53 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: nate@yogotech.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Connectivity issues (was Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org) Message-ID: <3AE591A1.837CFCA4@softweyr.com> References: <200104232231.PAA11243@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > > > : That settles it: move the machine to Kansas or Nebraska. 8-)
> > > >
> > > > Actaully, Colorado would have better connectivity than either Kansas
> > > > or Nebraska :-)
> > >
> > > The safest place in the USA, seismically speaking, is northwestern
> > > Missouri. I don't know about their electricity politics, though,
> > > which is rather important, too.
> >
> > Actually, I would have thought that Wisconsin or Minnesota would be more
> > safe, because of the North American granite plate they're sitting on.
> > There's no way an earthquate would shake it, since it would be shaking
> > alot of North America. :)
> >
> > Flooding on the other hand seems to be a problem. :) :)
>
> Scottsdale, Arizona is statistically safer.
>
> That's why the Alcor cryonics facility is located there.
Probably because the really good caves in Missouri are already taken by
Budweiser (ha!) and the US Gov't.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AE591A1.837CFCA4>