Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 23:29:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <199905130529.XAA26354@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 May 1999 18:01:35 %2B0900." <199905120901.SAA04493@srapc288.sra.co.jp> References: <199905120901.SAA04493@srapc288.sra.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199905120901.SAA04493@srapc288.sra.co.jp> Noriyuki Soda writes: : This reminds me another ugly kluge in sys/pccard/i82365.h: : #define PCIC_INDEX_0 0x3E0 : #define PCIC_INDEX_1 (PCIC_INDEX_0 + 2) : This is the way what some clever FreeBSD people saids "right" to : Nakagawa-san, though Nakagawa-san never agreed that it is right, and : rather likes the newconfig way like below: : pcic0 at isa? port 0x3e0 : pcic1 at isa? port 0x3e2 : pcic* at pci? : pcic* at isapnp? : It is apparent which is better and cleaner for me. But perhaps you do : not agree with me. :-) This is a horrible kludge (eg what is in FreeBSD right now is bogus and truely evil). I like the way that newconfig attaches things, which is why I'm currently reworking the pccard code. Actually, I'd rather junk most/all of the code that is there now. The code was good for the time, but now it has been overtaken by events. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905130529.XAA26354>