Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:06:32 -0400 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1 Message-ID: <0CF1E2D7-6C82-4A8B-82C3-A5BF1ED939CF@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2jfcd43sBpHraWA=5e_Ka=hMD654m-5=boguPPbYXE4yw@mail.gmail.com> References: <5ED5CB56-2E2A-4D83-8CDA-6D6A0719ED19@distal.com> <AC67D073-D476-41F5-AC53-F671430BB493@distal.com> <CAOtMX2h52d0vtceuwcDk2dzkH-fZW32inhk-dfjLMJxetVXKYg@mail.gmail.com> <CB79EC2B-E793-4561-95E7-D1CEEEFC1D72@distal.com> <CAOtMX2i_zFYuOnEK_aVkpO_M8uJCvGYW%2BSzLn3OED4n5fKFoEA@mail.gmail.com> <6A20ABDA-9BEA-4526-94C1-5768AA564C13@distal.com> <CAOtMX2jfcd43sBpHraWA=5e_Ka=hMD654m-5=boguPPbYXE4yw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 13:59, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 11:50=E2=80=AFAM Chris Ross =
<cross+freebsd@distal.com> wrote:
>> % sudo zpool replace tank da3 da10
>> cannot replace da3 with da10: already in replacing/spare config; wait =
for completion or use 'zpool detach'
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> If there is no label on da10, and "zpool status" doesn't show any
> spares, then I don't know what the problem is. It's possible that
> /sbin/zpool is printing an incorrect error message; it's fairly
> notorious for that. You could try to debug it. Other wild guesses
> include:
> * maybe da3 is the disk with the out-of-date label. You could try
> physically removing it before doing "zpool replace"
Well, there is a problem there. /dev/da3, right now, is one of
the disks in zraid1-1, the second set. It=E2=80=99s working there, =
listed
as diskid/???
How can I map the diskid=E2=80=99s listed to the underlying device?
either by serial number or da#=E2=80=A6
> * Since exported pools can't have active spares, you could try
> exporting the pool and then reimporting it.
Okay. Lukcily this is _not_ a root on ZFS system, so that should
be doable. Hopefully there aren=E2=80=99t significant risks there?
Can I tell ZFS to reconsider the labels in the first zraid1?
since it=E2=80=99s still reporting da3 as missing/failed, and that =
kernel
dev is not what it thinks that is=E2=80=A6
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0CF1E2D7-6C82-4A8B-82C3-A5BF1ED939CF>