Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:22:09 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: David Greenman <dg@Root.COM> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel assertions Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960730001516.29370B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199607291358.GAA26833@root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 Jul 1996, David Greenman wrote: > >This was a simple example but I'm sure it could make code a lot less > >intricate in other places. > > ...and a lot less informative. I prefer the existing model. I think they are more informative when used to specify the parameter requirements immediately after the function is defined. Forget that a MACRO is being used to implement it and imagine that it was an integral part of the C language from the beginning. Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960730001516.29370B-100000>