Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:14:10 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/security/openssh-portable [GSSAPI] Message-ID: <22884.13426.541545.996203@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <647fa949-a2db-bee2-f1cf-0489efaaf0a7@FreeBSD.org> References: <22881.39939.778691.526731@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <647fa949-a2db-bee2-f1cf-0489efaaf0a7@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:41:16 -0700, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> said: > I'm open to committing patches to openssh-portable to support it that > people send via PR or email. I just have no means to test it or > motivation to maintain the GSS patch myself. In all honesty, I'd really just like the official package builds to include at least *an* openssh package that I can point to as "the one that interoperates with your (Debian|Ubuntu|CentOS|RHEL|Fedora) systems and does Kerberos right". I don't care about having the latest official OpenSSH release; those other guys are already backporting security patches, and since Simon seems to have handed off maintenance of the GSSAPI patch to them as well, I would just as soon stick with the version that's in $OTHER_OS. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22884.13426.541545.996203>