Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:55:59 -0700 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: papowell@astart.com, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work Message-ID: <E8B2DB17-7397-4BB7-95D1-76F2BFDB5278@dsl-only.net> In-Reply-To: <C25E8566-89FC-4CCE-A7AF-F8B18EB758D7@pfeifer.com> References: <6FD738D6-F163-4BC5-8E6E-A9B9F35595CD@dsl-only.net> <BD68F3F3-A81C-4830-9169-6188A05EF6B2@dsl-only.net> <82A991B0-FD8B-457F-8483-D61AE5E6D6F6@pfeifer.com> <F9DACFDB-AF70-461E-B6B2-D5E9385F6D9A@dsl-only.net> <C25E8566-89FC-4CCE-A7AF-F8B18EB758D7@pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017-Jun-29, at 3:10 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> = wrote: > Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard <markmi at = dsl-only.net>: >> A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1 >> and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 . >=20 > Thank you, Mark. Let me know how it went. In the meantime I'll prepare = the change for gcc5 itself. I'm not currently set up to run more than head on any of amd64, powerpc64, powerpc, aarch64, or armv6/7 (which are all I target). And I'm in the middle of attempting a fairly large jump to head -r320458 on those. (powerpc 32-bit and 64-bit just failed for libc++ time-usage compiling now that 32-bit has 64-bit time_t, including in world32/lib32 contexts for powerpc64.) It will likely be a while before I manage to have a 11.x context (without losing my head contexts), much less examples from all "my" 5 TARGET_ARCH's. (Given past wchar_t type handling problems (e.g.) for gcc targeting powerpc family members I think it should be checked.) I'll have to find and set up disks: I do not even have such handy/ready at the moment. [I got into this area by being asked questions, not by my direct use of release/11.0.1 , stable/11 , or a draft of release/11.1.0 .] I'll let you know when I have some test results but others may get some before I do. > . . . >> Eventually most of the lang/gcc* 's will need whatever >> technique is used. >=20 > Yes, agreed. Version 5 is most important since it's the default; then = 6; 4.x is for retro computing fans ;-), so 7 will then be next. [In my normal/head environment I'm switching to lang/gcc7-devel for gcc (from lang/gcc6 ) but I'm odd that way.] =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8B2DB17-7397-4BB7-95D1-76F2BFDB5278>