Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:55:59 -0700 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: papowell@astart.com, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work Message-ID: <E8B2DB17-7397-4BB7-95D1-76F2BFDB5278@dsl-only.net> In-Reply-To: <C25E8566-89FC-4CCE-A7AF-F8B18EB758D7@pfeifer.com> References: <6FD738D6-F163-4BC5-8E6E-A9B9F35595CD@dsl-only.net> <BD68F3F3-A81C-4830-9169-6188A05EF6B2@dsl-only.net> <82A991B0-FD8B-457F-8483-D61AE5E6D6F6@pfeifer.com> <F9DACFDB-AF70-461E-B6B2-D5E9385F6D9A@dsl-only.net> <C25E8566-89FC-4CCE-A7AF-F8B18EB758D7@pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017-Jun-29, at 3:10 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> wrote: > Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net>: >> A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1 >> and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 . > > Thank you, Mark. Let me know how it went. In the meantime I'll prepare the change for gcc5 itself. I'm not currently set up to run more than head on any of amd64, powerpc64, powerpc, aarch64, or armv6/7 (which are all I target). And I'm in the middle of attempting a fairly large jump to head -r320458 on those. (powerpc 32-bit and 64-bit just failed for libc++ time-usage compiling now that 32-bit has 64-bit time_t, including in world32/lib32 contexts for powerpc64.) It will likely be a while before I manage to have a 11.x context (without losing my head contexts), much less examples from all "my" 5 TARGET_ARCH's. (Given past wchar_t type handling problems (e.g.) for gcc targeting powerpc family members I think it should be checked.) I'll have to find and set up disks: I do not even have such handy/ready at the moment. [I got into this area by being asked questions, not by my direct use of release/11.0.1 , stable/11 , or a draft of release/11.1.0 .] I'll let you know when I have some test results but others may get some before I do. > . . . >> Eventually most of the lang/gcc* 's will need whatever >> technique is used. > > Yes, agreed. Version 5 is most important since it's the default; then 6; 4.x is for retro computing fans ;-), so 7 will then be next. [In my normal/head environment I'm switching to lang/gcc7-devel for gcc (from lang/gcc6 ) but I'm odd that way.] === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8B2DB17-7397-4BB7-95D1-76F2BFDB5278>