Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:10:31 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Message-ID: <3F71D007.3040406@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com> References: <200309241429.h8OETrhk097904@freefall.freebsd.org> <3F71ADCA.7090408@tenebras.com> <20030924162111.GA23542@sunbay.com> <3F71C733.6070708@tenebras.com> <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Right. But static ARP means something different. It means > that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply > to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if > IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface. Okay, I may have been misusing the term. I meant *permanent* and *manual* entries in the ARP table, via the arp command, and disabling ARP on the interface. That seems to work. What does your lexicon say for "static arp?"home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F71D007.3040406>