Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:10:31 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Message-ID: <3F71D007.3040406@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com> References: <200309241429.h8OETrhk097904@freefall.freebsd.org> <3F71ADCA.7090408@tenebras.com> <20030924162111.GA23542@sunbay.com> <3F71C733.6070708@tenebras.com> <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Right. But static ARP means something different. It means > that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply > to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if > IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface. Okay, I may have been misusing the term. I meant *permanent* and *manual* entries in the ARP table, via the arp command, and disabling ARP on the interface. That seems to work. What does your lexicon say for "static arp?"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F71D007.3040406>