Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:12:13 -0300 From: "Nicolas Gieczewski" <foo@bar.org> To: <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Cc: babjak@neuron.tuke.sk Subject: Re: why native jdk? Message-ID: <036f01c3daa0$0ed88800$0200a8c0@veggy.org> References: <20040114124727.GA8303@neuron.tuke.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just like Sheldon said, the native JDK _is_ more stable than the Linux = one. Of course, you may not notice any differences during your = particular usage. I run a rather complex console multi-threaded = application that used to crash the Linux JDK, whereas the native JDK = never had any problems with it. Furthermore, I believe I had to turn = /dev/random into a link to /dev/urandom for SSL handshaking to work on = the Linux SDK. Cheers, Nicolas Gieczewski Nix Software Solutions http://www.nixsoftware.com/ ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Jozef Babjak" <babjak@neuron.tuke.sk> To: <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 09:47 Subject: why native jdk? Hi,=20 can you explain me (or redirect me to appropriate documentation) what=20 are advantages of building native jdk under FreeBSD (-stable) instead=20 of the using linux-jdk under linux compatibility mode? Thank you. Jozef.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?036f01c3daa0$0ed88800$0200a8c0>