Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:47:19 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Will 8 Intel EtherExpress PRO 10/100's be a problem? Message-ID: <19980626204719.24634@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980625222746.12068B-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us>; from Chris Dillon on Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 11:32:35PM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980625222746.12068B-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 11:32:35PM -0500, Chris Dillon wrote: > 3) If i ever end up using natd for all of this, would there be any > problems with it servicing those 7 networks (probably max 100 hosts per > network)? The only part that I know have problems with scaling is the link expiration structure. The other data structures are AFAIR all logarithmic. I have almost-finished patches for replacing this, I've just not felt like building the regression test framework for it (given that I only write code for this, but don't actively use natd/libalias for my personal workspace any more - I have customers that do, though). If you get problems, yell. It _will_ be solved. natd shall scale that far :-) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980626204719.24634>