Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Apr 1998 11:54:51 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The "Anti-GPL"
Message-ID:  <199804211754.LAA28936@narnia.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <199804211519.JAA07257@lariat.lariat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199804211519.JAA07257@lariat.lariat.org> you wrote:
> I had an interesting discussion with some friends who 
> are Linux "fanatics" last night. They said that the *BSDs
> will naturally never do as well as Linux, because the GPL
> "locks" code into the GNU model. That is to day, the Linux
> folks can take code from FreeBSD, add their own, and 
> "copyleft" the result -- at which point it can't be
> published again under the less restrictive Berkeley license.
> (And to think that the Linux folks claim that *others*
> "take code hostage.")

This is simply untrue.  The GPL requires that no additional
restrictions be placed on the code other than the terms of
the GPL.  So, unless your copyright has no terms or, as is
the case with the aic7xxx driver explicitly allows the
replacement of the licensing terms with the GPL, you cannot
mix GPL and non-GPL code in a single binary object.

--
Justin

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804211754.LAA28936>