Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 23:12:47 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Soeren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atacontrol not reflecting disabled write cache (or rogue hdd?) Message-ID: <200305132312.53673.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200304240547.h3O5l6Vm002937@spider.deepcore.dk> References: <200304240547.h3O5l6Vm002937@spider.deepcore.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_V/Vw+OpMfIvdhGp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 24 April 2003 07:47, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Michael Nottebrock wrote: > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > I've recently changed hw.ata.wc to 0 (via loader.conf.local) on two > > systems and on both systems atacontrol cap still says write cache > > supported & enabled (sysctl confirms the setting being 0). One system is > > 5.0-RELEASE, the other 4.8-RC. > > > > Is atacontrol lying or do the drives insist on write caching? > > I'd say the drives insists on it beeing on... Reviving this thread because I made an interesting observation: I recently= =20 changed to Mobo of the 5.0-RELEASE system from an ASUS P2B-B (Intel=20 440BX/PIIX4) to an ASUS CUSL2-M (Intel 815E/ICH2) and lo and behold - the=20 write cache is disabled now, according to atacontrol cap. Maybe there is a= =20 bug hidden in there somewhere after all... =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_V/Vw+OpMfIvdhGp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+wV/VXhc68WspdLARAgtrAKCj3Ut7HE4iJOnARplGLW+UN3dqiACgqKHA yZR9OpJW0qNR8MnHsMjWst8= =p9vk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_V/Vw+OpMfIvdhGp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305132312.53673.michaelnottebrock>