Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:51:36 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: NetWare client in -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101646100.9907-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990910182957.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest > of it could be a port I think :) Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port. Other thoughts ? -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101646100.9907-100000>