Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jan 2013 16:51:11 +0000
From:      David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>
To:        Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?
Message-ID:  <78AC11F6-7AAE-449D-9ED1-DB5B207152DA@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <50E9AAF4.209@freebsd.org>
References:  <20121227150724.GA1431@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <50DC65F5.6060004@freebsd.org> <50E0BD66.4070609@FreeBSD.org> <20130102135950.GA1464@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <20130104154940.GD1430@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <20130106141708.GA1418@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <EA4BC8F5-A501-4E4A-A223-7572B9A65758@FreeBSD.org> <50E9AAF4.209@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:

> No. It's completely broken at all optimization levels. There do not
> appear to be any flags that change the behavior. Building unwind-dw2.c
> either with gcc or with the previous import of clang in our tree does
> fix it, however.

Do you have an LLVM PR# for this that I can follow?

David



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78AC11F6-7AAE-449D-9ED1-DB5B207152DA>