Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:39:31 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/eisa ahb.c Message-ID: <199901280639.XAA26901@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199901280635.WAA96069@apollo.backplane.com> References: <199901280133.RAA40079@freefall.freebsd.org> <199901280332.UAA25969@pluto.plutotech.com> <199901280546.WAA26358@mt.sri.com> <199901280609.WAA93705@apollo.backplane.com> <199901280626.XAA26749@mt.sri.com> <199901280635.WAA96069@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> :Great, then only do it if you understand it. Like you've done for a > :number of things. My problem is that you commit your 'compiler > :cleanups' even though you've never even given anyone a chance to comment > :on it, thus making it that much harder for those of us who actually > :*want* to understand what you're do. > > The difference between you and me is simple, Nate. I'm going off and > doing things. You are just sitting around being a critic. Actually, no. I'm just not involved in things as 'sexy' as the kernel VM stuff. Does that mean I don't care what happens in FreeBSD, or have a stake in it's stability, or have any idea what is good/bad? Discounting me just because you've committed a bunch of code doesn't make your statements any more relevant than mine. Heck, let's add up the amount of code that I've committed to FreeBSD and compare it to yours. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901280639.XAA26901>