Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:31:29 +0200 From: Unix <unix@dominique-werner.com> To: Joel Rees <rees@ddcom.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599 Message-ID: <42F9C971.9070206@dominique-werner.com> In-Reply-To: <90CD1F31-6893-4367-A21C-05866DEA5855@ddcom.co.jp> References: <42F7F7E8.1020507@mail.uni-mainz.de> <42F9009E.3030601@mac.com> <42F92FEE.8060305@mail.uni-mainz.de> <90CD1F31-6893-4367-A21C-05866DEA5855@ddcom.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joel Rees wrote: > > On 平成 17/08/10, at 7:36, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> [...] When is SCSI back for desktops? > > > I vote for that. > > In my opinion, ATA is primarily for home media systems, if that. > > Joel Rees <rees@ddcom.co.jp> > digitcom, inc. 株式会社デジコム > Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 > ** <http://www.ddcom.co.jp>; ** > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I thought the WD Raptors were supposed to replace the SCSI for that purpose. I used to run one in a Powermac and performance wise it behaved very well, unfortunately I haven't had the chance to test the 30 or 70 GB WD Raptor SATA in FreeBSD..S/ATA drives should never be used for 24/7 or server use anyway, they die after a while, in my case, two 80gb seagate drives after 1.5 yrs with proper cooling...thing is that SCSI drives are not affordable to the regular home server user...if they were, I bet more people would use them so that's why the current alternatives are ATA and SATA and SATA Raptors.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F9C971.9070206>