Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Nov 1999 23:22:50 +0100
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: hole(s) in default rc.firewall rules
Message-ID:  <19991101232250.C39857@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <381DB3B2.10002A43@algroup.co.uk>
References:  <381DAEE9.75C2EDA5@algroup.co.uk> <46576.941469757@verdi.nethelp.no> <381DB3B2.10002A43@algroup.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Adam Laurie:
> blocking UDP traffic to any low port. DNS replies come in on high ports
> (at least this is true on the half dozen or so boxes that I've

Default before bind 8.2.something was to use port 53 for all answers (from
server to server).
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep  9 00:20:51 CEST 1999



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991101232250.C39857>