Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:07:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: lev@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? Message-ID: <BANLkTi=-BSVYV0z59otkMCQk=1rDaGhN7g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <BANLkTimh582Lbsn0JmXg1MZmpEB%2BTYr6Gw@mail.gmail.com> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/4/11 Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>:
> Hello, Olivier.
> You wrote 11 апреля 2011 г., 11:51:09:
> (1) Copied out "upgrade" image has always ${NANO_LABEL}s1 label, and
> needs manual mdconfig+tunefs before dumping on second code partition
>
> (2) updatep2 script uses sed 's/${NANO_DRIVE}s1/${NANO_DRIVE}s2/'
> script, and if NANO_LABLE is in use (which sets NANO_DRIVE to
> "ufs/labels1") sed complains.
>
OK, I didn't see this problem because I'm using my own upgrade script
(I've merged update1 and update2 in one script):
http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/sbin/upgrade
You could try to adapt it to your needs.
Regards,
Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=-BSVYV0z59otkMCQk=1rDaGhN7g>