Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:27:02 +0300 From: Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org> To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls chapter.sgml Message-ID: <4210B536.60800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <420DEB6B.5090206@elvandar.org> References: <200502101204.j1AC42Il077257@repoman.freebsd.org> <420B587C.4000201@FreeBSD.org> <420DEB6B.5090206@elvandar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! Remko Lodder wrote: > Denis Peplin wrote: >> It seems that it is better to rename "Building the Rule Script" >> to something like "Building the Rule Script with Symbolic Substitution", >> or simply "Symbolic Substitution", >> because: >> >> "The rules are not important in this example; how the Symbolic >> substitution field are populated and used are." >> >> What do you think? > > > Hi Den, > > I think: "Building the Rule Script with Symbolic Substitution" > Is the best option of the 2 :-). > > cheers ! :) Title modified, thanks! :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4210B536.60800>