Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2006 07:51:38 -0400
From:      Joe <dev@freedomcircle.net>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: pkg_upgrade?
Message-ID:  <447D834A.90000@freedomcircle.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060531004426.GA36958@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <447B86F3.6070500@freedomcircle.net> <20060530002535.GA94917@xor.obsecurity.org> <447CB067.1080309@freedomcircle.net> <20060530213344.GA34025@xor.obsecurity.org> <447CC3C8.9020300@freedomcircle.net> <20060530222808.GA34725@xor.obsecurity.org> <447CDF69.4030704@freedomcircle.net> <20060531004426.GA36958@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:12:25PM -0400, Joe wrote:
>> The .ko files have a Nov 3 2005 date, whereas the files in /boot 
>> including the kernel directory have a May 6 2006 date.  I take it that 
>> Nov 3 means 6.0-RELEASE since the announcement was done on Nov 4.  So, I 
>> guess I'm back to the question of how to do a binary upgrade from 6.0 to 
>> 6.1 (and particularly where is this documented).  Should I attempt 
>> another sysinstall Upgrade?
> 
> Show me 
> 
> sysctl kern.version

kern.version: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov  3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
     root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

Note, btw that the manpages (at least the one for sysctl) show 
6.1-RELEASE at the bottom, confirming that parts of the base were indeed 
updated.

> and the output of a failed package fetch.

I'll try to send that a little later but seeing the above, shouldn't I 
just retry the binary upgrade and if so, what precautions should I take? 
  I'm thinking of skipping the install of X.org so that no package 
conflicts turn up.

Joe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?447D834A.90000>