Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:15:40 +0400 From: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> To: "Ed Schouten" <ed@fxq.nl> Cc: current@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <a31046fc0708291215k560544c2kec8c1cea8f208ef@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070829190633.GD21190@hoeg.nl> References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <a31046fc0708291203s3e71d603ka7b34cc320a8166a@mail.gmail.com> <20070829190633.GD21190@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29/08/2007, Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> wrote: > * pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> wrote: > > there will be no k9. > > I heard they stopped development, because it turned out to be dog slow. > > -- > Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> > WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ > > yeap :). As Giuseppe Amato, AMD's Technical Director for EMEA, said that "There was a K9, but its performance was a bit of a dog" :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a31046fc0708291215k560544c2kec8c1cea8f208ef>