Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:03:46 +0100 From: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting FreeBSD on MPC8540 eval board Message-ID: <47D95E72.1050904@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <62FE92BB-0272-46A7-BDA9-5992FDE2F2D9@mac.com> References: <be2f52430803120811rf734af3ubf8fff00f253a71d@mail.gmail.com> <47D7FA35.30204@semihalf.com> <be2f52430803130138n5d667b9vef2f8c1f2c5bb128@mail.gmail.com> <47D905E8.5020608@semihalf.com> <62FE92BB-0272-46A7-BDA9-5992FDE2F2D9@mac.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> I don't think so, just having miibus should suffice. The problem >> you're having >> is likely caused by a different MAC-PHY topology than is for CDS >> boards the >> port was mainly tested on. >> >> The hidden assumption we currently have requires a 1:1 mapping between >> TSEC >> units and PHY numbers they are 'routed' to. We don't deal too well with >> other/mixed MAC-PHY topologies that various systems can have. > > We fixed this at Juniper. If you're done with TSEC for now, I > can backport the changes... > Hi Marcel, Feel free to commit your fixes. I'm reworking the TSEC driver structure that we discussed, but it's not ready yet, so go ahead. Rafalhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47D95E72.1050904>