Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:13:58 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r216955 - head/usr.sbin/rtprio Message-ID: <86bp3the8p.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110106214243.GA51802__16340.9905079336$1294350178$gmane$org@freebsd.org> (Alexander Best's message of "Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:42:43 %2B0000") References: <201101041413.p04EDA4f038360@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTimDTq-JXF4gm9KUfo5eJaEXKaRF-CYiycFwdZML@mail.gmail.com> <20110106211017.GA46874@freebsd.org> <201101061618.39695.jhb@freebsd.org> <20110106214243.GA51802__16340.9905079336$1294350178$gmane$org@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> writes: > On Thu Jan 6 11, John Baldwin wrote: >> Note that that usage is rather pointless since it means you apply rtprio to >> the 'rtprio' process that is about to exit. :) > > yeah but at least it makes the usage of -X consistent. ;) also consider the > following: the current shell has idle priority and you want to run rtprio in > normal priority. then rtprio -t -0 would be a neat way of doing > rtprio -t rtprio. ;) wel...not quite, because the priotity gets set to "NORMAL" > when rtprio is almost finished running. ;) I think it'd be useful if the syntax allowed smth like $ rtprio 1 -0 -111 -222 -333 -444 -555 ... > > i admit using -0 for setting rtpio's own priority isn't very useful, but the > rtprio(1) manual states: > > Pid of 0 means "the current process".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bp3the8p.fsf>