Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:50:29 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating callout_reset Message-ID: <62672.1075103429@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:42:44 CST." <20040126013147.A1599@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040126013147.A1599@odysseus.silby.com>, Mike Silbersack writes: >> Make it a 64bit count of nanoseconds instead that way it can be >> used as a literal constant. >> >> It's OK with me if we want to have a function to contain the "* >> 1000000000LL" factor for us, and maybe even convenience functions >> for milli and microseconds. >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > >Ah, that would work better. I guess this getting ideas reviewed process >does help. :) > >Do we have a preexisting name for the "64bit nanoseconds" type? No, and I don't think we need one for this. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62672.1075103429>