Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:22:16 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: kael@sonic.net Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ldexpf in 6.x amd64 Message-ID: <20061208172215.GA50992@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <cd02cc220612080828h759db2dcj95c0a6d39a8abb22@mail.gmail.com> References: <cd02cc220612080828h759db2dcj95c0a6d39a8abb22@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:28:18AM -0800, Kael Fischer wrote: > I have 14 intel blades running 6.0-R. ldexpf is missing on these > systems (ldexp, and ldexpd are in libm.so). I know this has come up > before on various lists, but I am looking for a little clarification. > > 1) here is a patch that Steve Kargl proposed on freebsd-current last > year. Is this going to do the trick?: > > --- /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c.orig Mon Dec 5 13:29:47 2005 > +++ /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c Mon Dec 5 13:28:53 2005 > @@ -42,3 +42,5 @@ > return scalbnf(x,(int)fn); > #endif > } > + > +__weak_reference(scalbf, ldexpf); > I believe you want revision 1.8 of s_scalbnf.c. If I read http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/msun/src/s_scalbnf.c correctly, 6.0 should already contain ldexpf. > 2) is 'cd /usr/src/lib/msun; make' sufficient to rebuild libm.so ? yes. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061208172215.GA50992>