Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:38:10 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> To: "Jose M. Alcaide" <jose@we.lc.ehu.es> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103122037430.981-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <3AACDD68.8A03384E@we.lc.ehu.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > Actually, there's one more question I have about XFree-4. IIUC, core GL
> > libs, such as libGL.so, libOSMesa.so, etc are included in XFree 4.0.2 core
> > distribution. So how come that lots of applications still have Mesa-3.2
> > in their dependencies?
> >
>
> The Mesa bits included in XFree86 4.0.2 are a subset of the Mesa-3.2 port.
> If you have XFree86 4.0.2 installed, you should define XFREE86_VERSION=4
> in /etc/make.conf; then, the Mesa 3.2 port only installs the files not
> included in XFree-4. Also, the ports which use the Xpm library do not
> depend on the xpm port (XFree-4 includes Xpm).
>
> Still there are some ports which have not been adapted to the
> XFREE86_VERSION mechanism; one of these is x11-toolkits/xaw3d: its
> Makefile checks for the existence of ${X11BASE}/XFree86 in order to
> find out what XFree86 version is installed.
Thanks a lot for your response.
//danfe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10103122037430.981-100000>