Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:43:25 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r206046 - in head/crypto/openssl: . apps crypto crypto/asn1 crypto/bio crypto/bn crypto/bn/asm crypto/engine crypto/evp crypto/ocsp crypto/rand engines fips ssl Message-ID: <20100401204324.GB1301@arthur.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <4BB4E3DF.8030407@FreeBSD.org> References: <201004011519.o31FJpw2068549@svn.freebsd.org> <4BB4E3DF.8030407@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
B0;253;0cOn 2010.04.01 11:20:15 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/01/10 08:19, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > Author: simon > > Date: Thu Apr 1 15:19:51 2010 > > New Revision: 206046 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/206046 > > > > Log: > > Merge OpenSSL 0.9.8n into head. > > Just curious, why not 1.0.0? The main reason is that 0.9.8n is needed for MFC to 7 and 8, so I prefered to get it tested a bit in -CURRENT first while I have the chance. I also prefered to get the security fixes for 0.9.8m into head faster - I don't know how much trouble 1.0.0 will be, but it will probably take some work. That said, given how long OpenSSL 1.0 has been under way it would have been perfect to commit it today of all days :-). -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100401204324.GB1301>