Date: 28 May 2003 15:59:40 +1000 From: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: policy on GPL'd drivers? Message-ID: <1054101579.31549.86.camel@boxster> In-Reply-To: <200305281447.02322.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <1054092793.1429.39.camel@boxster> <200305281350.27953.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20030527.231123.88346899.imp@bsdimp.com> <200305281447.02322.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
By doing that aren't you assuming that the kernel will be installed on the machine that built it, and not potentially somewhere else? What about sysinstall upgrades that don't require src? Seeya...Q On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 15:17, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2003 14:41, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <200305281350.27953.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> > > > > "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> writes: > > : Maybe the kernel build stuff can look in /usr/local/src/sys/modules for > > : things to build or something.. > > > > YUCK! > > *WHY?* > > I have asked this before BTW, and I haven't been told why it sucks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1054101579.31549.86.camel>