Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:31:33 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chico <chicoman341978@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-config@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rule Numbering... Message-ID: <20030813063133.GA52431@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com> References: <0b5401c35c56$a8f6df40$0f01010a@lambda> <20030812200556.76245.qmail@web12002.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:05:56PM -0700, Chico wrote: > I am wondering what the deal is with the Rule > numbering in IPFW? I am switching from IPF to IPFW > because it has more functionality, however I am > confused with the rule numbering scheme. When I read > "how-to's" on the internet people are numbering the > firewall rules in there /etc/ipfw.rules file starting > with 00300, 00301... and then start going to 00400, > 00401, 00402... What the deal with this scheme? Pure arbitrariness. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/OdtFWry0BWjoQKURAqwmAKDaXdi6fudITCsSjrjtwdxow8ecQQCeNe6I tdftLyFbkpjAI/8Sbyh2N8E= =FjnR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030813063133.GA52431>
