Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 10:45:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: linux-devel naming (was Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-base-5.2...) Message-ID: <19990709104544.A92341@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3785D165.61AC67BC@scc.nl>; from Marcel Moolenaar on Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 12:39:33PM %2B0200 References: <6514.931435144@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <3784953E.20F2005E@scc.nl> <19990708114649.A67400@dragon.nuxi.com> <3784FA51.639E1920@scc.nl> <19990708223740.A3633@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <19990708220450.C29714@mad> <3785983D.EF769633@scc.nl> <19990709054512.B84634@mad> <3785D165.61AC67BC@scc.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> \begin{RFC}
> I've not committed linux-devel yet, so now is the time to decide if it
> should be called that way because it replaces linux_devel, or that we
> should think of an alternative to avoid confusion with common
> -devel/-latest tags.
> \end{RFC}
Personally I think your new port should live in `linux_devel'. It is
effectively updates the existing port. Why rename the port name that
people are familar with? "-devel" should be avoided.
--
-- David (who does not mind "_" one bit)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990709104544.A92341>