Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:44:25 +0200 From: Marian Hettwer <MH@kernel32.de> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL Performance 6.0rc1 Message-ID: <43614A39.6050706@kernel32.de> In-Reply-To: <86mzku1w0q.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <435F48DA.6060009@kernel32.de> <20051026105411.L32255@fledge.watson.org> <435F6B01.5020003@kernel32.de> <86zmov3utn.fsf@xps.des.no> <4361443B.9030606@kernel32.de> <86mzku1w0q.fsf@xps.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi there,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Marian Hettwer <MH@kernel32.de> writes:
>
>>To get this straight: It doesn't matter wether I use the "long" way,
>>or the way you mentioned (which I only used when doing a make
>>world...)?
>
>
> You should use the *documented* and *supported* way ('make
> buildkernel') unless you really know what you're doing.
>
Well, now you shocked me a wee bit, 'cause I thought the "make depend"
way would be the documented and supported way.
Granted, I didn't took a look into the FreeBSD Handbook for building my
Kernel since 4.0, but now I did.
And I am glad, that the way I mentioned in my last way is documented
(and probably supported) und the chapter "Procedure 1. Building a Kernel
the “Traditional” Way" which is at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
The way you described is mentioned as "Procedure 2. Building a Kernel
the “New” Way" :-)
Well then, I think we're fine on that topic. I'd probably change to the
"New" Way, since it's fewer commands to type in...
Marian
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43614A39.6050706>