Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:44:25 +0200 From: Marian Hettwer <MH@kernel32.de> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL Performance 6.0rc1 Message-ID: <43614A39.6050706@kernel32.de> In-Reply-To: <86mzku1w0q.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <435F48DA.6060009@kernel32.de> <20051026105411.L32255@fledge.watson.org> <435F6B01.5020003@kernel32.de> <86zmov3utn.fsf@xps.des.no> <4361443B.9030606@kernel32.de> <86mzku1w0q.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there,
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:
> Marian Hettwer <MH@kernel32.de> writes:
>=20
>>To get this straight: It doesn't matter wether I use the "long" way,
>>or the way you mentioned (which I only used when doing a make
>>world...)?
>=20
>=20
> You should use the *documented* and *supported* way ('make
> buildkernel') unless you really know what you're doing.
>=20
Well, now you shocked me a wee bit, 'cause I thought the "make depend"=20
way would be the documented and supported way.
Granted, I didn't took a look into the FreeBSD Handbook for building my=20
Kernel since 4.0, but now I did.
And I am glad, that the way I mentioned in my last way is documented=20
(and probably supported) und the chapter "Procedure 1. Building a Kernel =
the =E2=80=9CTraditional=E2=80=9D Way" which is at:=20
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-bu=
ilding.html
The way you described is mentioned as "Procedure 2. Building a Kernel=20
the =E2=80=9CNew=E2=80=9D Way" :-)
Well then, I think we're fine on that topic. I'd probably change to the=20
"New" Way, since it's fewer commands to type in...
Marian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43614A39.6050706>