Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400 From: Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Jail question Message-ID: <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com> References: <a326819258145be7f52702ca68402e23.squirrel@www.webcontracts.co.uk> <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400 Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> articulated: > Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports > collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task > of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get > qjail from here. http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/ I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually accepted and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks or so. Perhaps there is a specific reason why this port has not been accepted/released into the ports system. Have you, or whom ever submitted the port, requested clarification as to why it has not been accepted/released? Before issuing a blank condemnation of the port's department it would seem like the logical course of action. If you don't receive a satisfactory reply with two weeks, then it might be worth escalating the matter. Just my 2¢. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101015093244.69e01d83>