Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:50:50 +0200
From:      Nickola Kolev <nikky@mnet.bg>
To:        "Ronnel P. Maglasang" <rmaglasang@infoweapons.com>
Cc:        Balgansuren Batsukh <balgaa@mongol.net>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bandwidth manager solution
Message-ID:  <20071112095050.ec55eb1d.nikky@mnet.bg>
In-Reply-To: <4737A52C.2060805@infoweapons.com>
References:  <015301c8221f$68ebe600$c801000a@balgaa> <4733370D.2010705@bestnet.kharkov.ua> <20071109162419.ab37c614.nikky@mnet.bg> <4737A52C.2060805@infoweapons.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__12_Nov_2007_09_50_50_+0200_AWSeWruYqg_0448A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

=D0=9D=D0=B0 Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:58:20 +0800
"Ronnel P. Maglasang" <rmaglasang@infoweapons.com> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=
=D1=81=D0=B0:

> i believe you can modify the default limit of classes. using ALTQs
> HFSC scheduler, just set HFSC_MAX_CLASSES to a desired limit
> and rebuild the kernel.

Yes, I'm aware of that, but have you tried this on a production system?
Or at least on a system with high enough number of classes, let's say
1K, 2K or more? How stable would that system be? Just curious...

> Nickola Kolev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ?? Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:19:25 +0200
> > Gregory Edigarov <greg@bestnet.kharkov.ua> ??????:
> >
> >  =20
> >> Balgansuren Batsukh wrote:
> >>    =20
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> Is there any hardware vendor suggest for me?
> >>>
> >>> I need to manage bandwidth management 1xSTM-1/OC3-2xSTM-1 optical
> >>> IP bandwidth circuit.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone has experience with www.etinc.com bandwidth manager?
> >>>
> >>> I saw others like Allot, Packeteer, Cisco SCE2000 only doing
> >>> protocol, service based bandwidth management using TCP rate limit,
> >>> fair queueing.
> >>>
> >>> I am looking high performance bandwidth manager, traffic shaper
> >>> for IP core network to configure leased line, xDSL, Ethernet,
> >>> GPON/EPON, wireless subscribers.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any FreeBSD based solution?
> >>>  =20
> >>>      =20
> >> Uhmmm. Well. Does 'ipfw pipe' or pf altq enoug freebsd based
> >> solution? ;-)
> >>    =20
> >
> > IPFW is a mere traffic shaper, and not a traffic control solution.
> > Will pf/altq be flexible enough with its limit of 64 classes?
> >
> >  =20
>=20
>=20


--=20
Regards,
Nickola Kolev

--Signature=_Mon__12_Nov_2007_09_50_50_+0200_AWSeWruYqg_0448A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHOAXf/g+8nwXNejkRAkTMAJ4qxFwLw9mfWT7yL/bdF9kdCDuIpQCfUpF/
I0stSUZ8Y4HwziwFcVdveUo=
=xwyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__12_Nov_2007_09_50_50_+0200_AWSeWruYqg_0448A--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071112095050.ec55eb1d.nikky>