Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:30:38 -0500 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <CACqU3MU5H-gRNo2%2Bc%2BZOWoE5pTd_Gmdo-JdV3oXTpw0z58oM6A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndDLpESvXnBsSCwOTqymu2BC=hKj9AQUrVX6D6iPrAOquA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com> <20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan> <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CACqU3MWiMpUNJ9d2t=OxfDHD47evvkgKcwLkiNBgEheWFJrzjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDLpESvXnBsSCwOTqymu2BC=hKj9AQUrVX6D6iPrAOquA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, [resend on the ml, my bad] On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann >> <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: >>> >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTAyNzA >>> >> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is >> using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to >> out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-) >> >> Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of >> people are still in abnegation... >> >> my 0.2c, >> =A0- Arnaud > > Said by someone which really thinks passing __FILE__ and __LINE__ to > kernel function is going to give a mesaurable performance penalty is > really hilarious however :) > You are right, the rest of the kernel's subsystem are so sluggish, fragile and half baked that this would barely improve anything... That will be my last word in this thread. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MU5H-gRNo2%2Bc%2BZOWoE5pTd_Gmdo-JdV3oXTpw0z58oM6A>