Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:46:12 -0500 From: D'Arcy Cain <darcy@druid.net> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: RAID - hardware vs. ZFS Message-ID: <e2ae7253-732b-ea37-f6d8-b93a5d532da2@druid.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --7iNEsJdAnghEoLIIgGoLK5pr2tLCg5MtW Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NCwHcl2OIXHE2Y3tCHx1FvJh6KHsuToJ6" --NCwHcl2OIXHE2Y3tCHx1FvJh6KHsuToJ6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have to purchase new servers soon. I am planning on getting Proliant DL360 servers. These come with hardware RAID. I was wondering what opinions people had about hardware RAID vs. using ZFS for RAID. Is one safer than the other? What about performance? What about hot swapping? All opinions welcome. --=20 D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: darcy@VybeNetworks.com, VoIP: sip:darcy@druid.net --NCwHcl2OIXHE2Y3tCHx1FvJh6KHsuToJ6-- --7iNEsJdAnghEoLIIgGoLK5pr2tLCg5MtW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQQZ0YBgv7psnnP4U/HhAAd6d7lwwgUCXrrExAAKCRDhAAd6d7lw wtjbAQC5XDWpjh/ce9Y6E5wi6wzXktL3P9pg0GEZjjHSjOho5QEA70M+KwdGDTpj ZrvVphgxYhk1n7gswfQCPxVL79mXgQ8= =V4oU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iNEsJdAnghEoLIIgGoLK5pr2tLCg5MtW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e2ae7253-732b-ea37-f6d8-b93a5d532da2>