Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:22:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Add note to UPDATING (was: Re: inetd_enable Message-ID: <20020419182013.Q18267-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <15552.30670.690121.496470@horsey.gshapiro.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> Actually, I didn't even notice this. I would like to put the
> sendmail_enable default back to YES in the branch for the sake of POLA.
The more I think about this, the more I think it might need to be
yes in both places. Is there a way to configure new sendmail to accept
outgoing connections without needing daemons running? If so, it might make
more sense to have that be the default setup, and leave the _enable off
both places. If not, we should probably turn it on both places, with just
the outgoing mail stuff set up by default.
--
"We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory."
- George W. Bush, President of the United States
State of the Union, January 28, 2002
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020419182013.Q18267-100000>