Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 02:08:06 +0400 (MSD) From: .@babolo.ru To: areilly@bigpond.net.au (Andrew Reilly) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: technical comparison Message-ID: <200105262208.CAA20932@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010526192516.A2573@gurney.reilly.home> from "Andrew Reilly" at "May 26, 1 07:25:16 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Reilly writes: > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 08:49:21PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > There is _no_ performance problem with "the existing implementation", > > if you treat "postgres" as "the existing implementation"; it will do > > what you want, quickly and effectively, for millions of record keys. > > Does postgres make a good mail archive database? Can it handle Yes, I look at it to replace my messarge. > arbitrary record lengths? It couldn't the last time I looked at > it. Now (7.1) it can. -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105262208.CAA20932>