Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:06:12 -0500 From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) Cc: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig chapter.sgml Message-ID: <200101241306.f0OD6Cc09640@green.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Message from alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) of "Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:26:54 %2B0100." <20010124132654.A48977@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) wrote: > Thus spake Ben Smithurst (ben@freebsd.org): > > > Document the KERNEL -> KERNCONF change for buildkernel in -CURRENT. > > Hmm. > No there are three versions of how to build in the handbook. > I don't think that this is good, since -CURRENT people usually don't > need the handbook anyways. (that is what UPDATING is for). > > I *really* would suggest that this change is backed out until KERNCONF > hits -STABLE and then the whole part is changed. I think that you are right about this, Alex. We don't need to support -CURRENT that much (if you aren't sophisticated enough with -CURRENT to know to use UPDATING, don't touch it in the first place). -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101241306.f0OD6Cc09640>