Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:47:07 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed Message-ID: <20040323004707.GG87493@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <405F84AD.1070708@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200403222030.i2MKUsxc063289@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <20040322211501.GB87493@toxic.magnesium.net> <405F84AD.1070708@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (03.22.2004 @ 1928 PST): Oliver Eikemeier said, in 0.8K: << > Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>>(03.22.2004 @ 1530 PST): Kris Kennaway said, in 1.6K: << > >> > >>INDEX build failed with errors: > >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 > >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: es-openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 > >> > >>>end of "INDEX build failed" from Kris Kennaway << > > > >I recognize that it's an unbelievable amount of work to make openoffice > >build right, but can development please be done elsewhere? The port > >doesn't even build right now (it rejects any jdk I have installed in > >configure). If 1.1.1.RC1 isn't working, can you please put 1.1 back in > >the tree? > > > >You're not using openoffice-2.0 for anything. Why not use that for the > >1.1.1.RC1 development for the time being? > > See the discussion in > <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2004-March/thread.html#29662>; > >> end of "Re: INDEX build failed" from Oliver Eikemeier << I'm aware of that thread, but I haven't seen noticed anything done about it, except that it now breaks INDEX builds. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@gnome.org \\oo// adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx \\// adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040323004707.GG87493>