Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:50:30 +0200 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext Message-ID: <1113241831.934.5.camel@cream.xbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050411152310.1fea4df6@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org> <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <20050411152310.1fea4df6@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-kHRyI/dZOUuwvfsyEl7M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Monday 11 April 2005 =E0 15:23 +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu a =E9crit : > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 > "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> wrote: >=20 > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: > >=20 > > > obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: >=20 > [ ... ] >=20 > Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) >=20 > flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to > back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides. Well, actually I'm going to fix all of these. He raised an interesting issue, fixing is better than backout=20 the commit. The number of broken ports isn't so high. /me raises mutex. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org --=-kHRyI/dZOUuwvfsyEl7M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCWrjmMxEkbVFH3PQRAg+DAKCKOmzxQO/8UDv5dqhRG2qdGdcNWgCfauoz LyZgzuADTUSpsKzHcnhABO4= =eEHg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kHRyI/dZOUuwvfsyEl7M--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1113241831.934.5.camel>