Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 03:39:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 269857] devel/apr1: update to 1.7.3 Message-ID: <bug-269857-16115-7lAloVDCGy@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-269857-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-269857-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D269857 --- Comment #9 from Enji Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org> --- Comment on attachment 241267 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D241267 [patch] devel/apr1 update for bdb support (allow no bdb, add correct AGPLv3 license if bdb18) Technically bdb 6.0+ is AGPL; all prior releases have a different license: = the Sleepycat license, which is very similar to BSD 3-clause: https://opensource.org/license/sleepycat-php/ . Does it make sense to mark this APL if the library is linked dynamically? I= ANAL and I'm not sure about static linking, but I thought dynamic linking only affected the resulting program once the code (as a whole) was run? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-269857-16115-7lAloVDCGy>