Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:44:28 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program Message-ID: <CAGH67wQM1aZJb8u6BhjLoieTW83tUXcDzHFpvm85z0dR5%2B2qxA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121004162910.GQ23688@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <CAGH67wRkOmy7rWLkxXnT2155PuSQpwOMyu7dTAKeO1WW2dju7g@mail.gmail.com> <201210020750.23358.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wTM1VDrpu7rS=VE1G_kVEOHhS4-OCy5FX_6eDGmiNTA8A@mail.gmail.com> <201210021037.27762.jhb@freebsd.org> <5BC1F38C-C354-4A01-B809-A8FE64824ABD@neville-neil.com> <20121004162910.GQ23688@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:11:21PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>> ...
>> But, I would like to drive this to a solution on arch@. We don't have an
>> atf@, but we do have a test@ and testing@. We have too many mailing
>> lists already, so let's finish this up here if we can and then
>> continue talking on testing@.
>> ...
>
> Before folks get too excited about test@ & testing@:
>
> * test@ is for testing ability to send mail to FreeBSD.org (mailing
> lists).
>
> * testing@ *used* to exist, but was retired for lack of relevant
> traffic.
>
> * There's little difference in effort in resurrecting testing@ vs.
> creating atf@.
I think that resurrecting testing@ makes more sense as creating an
atf specific list seems a bit too focused on ATF, primarily because
atf is being "partially superseded" by kyua (pronounced Q-A) in the
near future.
Thanks!
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wQM1aZJb8u6BhjLoieTW83tUXcDzHFpvm85z0dR5%2B2qxA>