Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:16:35 -0500 From: David Cuthbert <dacut@kanga.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC Message-ID: <3E009153.2080201@kanga.org> In-Reply-To: <00b101c2a664$d823cb00$6805a8c0@gina> References: <24244.1039900460@critter.freebsd.dk> <9710634521.20021214232526@dds.nl> <3DFC0AB1.D60AAF66@mindspring.com> <200212160955.14531.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> <20021216180948.GD27912@zot.electricrain.com> <3DFFEA03.A27668A8@mindspring.com> <20021217194724.A36521@FreeBSD.org> <3DFFF387.9050304@kanga.org> <20021217200910.A37771@FreeBSD.org> <00b101c2a664$d823cb00$6805a8c0@gina>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Leif Neland wrote: > But still, would it be impossible to have both a GENERIC and a GENERIC386 > kernel in the distribution? Impossible, no... but would anyone use it? Seems to me that it would just take up space. And it's one more thing for the build gurus to keep a configuration for (though maybe they don't mind/care?). As long as someone can build a 386 kernel by throwing a few flags... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E009153.2080201>