Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Sep 2003 00:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma
Message-ID:  <20030902001718.V6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
In-Reply-To: <3F543FA0.7020801@freebsd.org>
References:  <41076.1062480964@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030901233731.U6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F543FA0.7020801@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:

> I still think that the real problem is in running swapon before
> savecore.  In 99% of the cases out there, RAM scales with storage,
> so I really can't imaging fsck needing to swap, and certainly not
> in it's 'preen-before-background' mode.

I agree, but the proble is that in order to make this successful in a
scenario when the system is well and truly fubar (which is where you're
most likely to want a good dump), then just moving it earlier isn't
enough.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030902001718.V6074>