Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:47:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191931] isatty(-1)/ttyname_r(-1, ...) sets EBADF instead of ENOTTY; does not conform to manpage/POSIX Message-ID: <bug-191931-8-IzfwEh6Lee@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191931-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191931-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191931 Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |Issue Resolved CC| |jilles@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #1 from Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> --- This looks like a bug in the standard that was fixed for POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4, which has the expected [EBADF] (invalid file descriptor) and [ENOTTY] (not a terminal) error conditions. According to the change history, the erratum is SD5-XSH-ERN-100. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191931-8-IzfwEh6Lee>