Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:42:32 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michel Santos <michel@lucenet.com.br> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> Subject: Re: diskio low read performance Message-ID: <20070113164232.GA34348@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <63758.200.152.83.36.1168689227.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br> References: <64656.200.152.83.36.1168651673.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br> <45A87878.1050505@paradise.net.nz> <63758.200.152.83.36.1168689227.squirrel@webmail.matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote: > I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no improvement > I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem > value. >=20 > Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely > nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is > disappointing. >=20 > Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work > well on 6.2? Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFqQv4Wry0BWjoQKURAlkNAJ9Hnieo6LKxkLVt94YeS6fyWQGyWACfVRN7 oIzYaxYr46/UhzV+NvGtVfo= =2m4d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070113164232.GA34348>