Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 22:27:36 -0400 From: Mark Plummer <markus@clark.net> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: /G=David/S=Sandel/DD.ALISA=SANDELD@mhs-emerson.attmail.com, "o=attmail/dd.id=" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 3C509 vs 3C590 Ethernet Support Message-ID: <199605100227.WAA04207@clark.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 May 1996 15:13:50 PDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960509151302.17596A-100000@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 9 May 1996 /G=David/S=Sandel/DD.ALISA=SANDELD@mhs-emerson.attmail.com > the snap back in late march did, so i assume the latest snap does. i've used it to some success, but performance is not good, particularly w' more than one card in the machine (we intended to use it as a router w' 4 of 'em). if anyone knows any more info on the little bit i've said, great; otherwise, i hope to get the details together and make a better post real soon... markus -- Mark Plummer, markus@clark.net, +1 410 796 1272
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605100227.WAA04207>