Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:31 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> To: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org Cc: hitmaster2k@yahoo.com, rizzo@icir.org, bts@babbleon.org, kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-ID: <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org> <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TytkXWuxah(=.EVh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > > As I already asked: > > what compile time options were used in the two cases ? > > They surely can make a huge difference. > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > Could it also be a possibility, that the NetBSD defaults differ from > the FreeBSD defaults, I think this could make some difference too. :) actually he mentioned in his post that he used the _same_ binary on fbsd and netbsd (statically linked, netbsd with fbsd emu layer) -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --TytkXWuxah(=.EVh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8jMypr5S+dk6z85oRAoosAJ9F4+ODcFpDdur6/7B+DoyWq9qAOgCgwyyC 9fTiD2gpoxFij/reqJOA3LQ= =4Nkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TytkXWuxah(=.EVh-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode>